[![Image][1] ][2]
It appears that the jury has come to a conclusion in the [Oracle v. Google trial][3], determining that Android does not infringe Oracle patents. Judge William Aslup of the US District court for Northern California exonerated the search giant following a trial that lasted three weeks, ruling that Google did not infringe on six claims in US Patent RE38,104, along two claims in US Patent 6,061,520.
Developing...
[Jury issues verdict in Android suit, finds that Google doesn't infringe Oracle patents][2] originally appeared on [Engadget][4] on Wed, 23 May 2012 14:05:00 EDT. Please see our [terms for use of feeds][5].
######
[Permalink][6] ![][7][The Verge][8], [CNET][9] | ![source][10][US District Court][11] | [Email this][12] | [Comments][13]
[1]: http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2012/05/oracle-v-google-1308942960.jpg
[2]: http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/
[3]: http://www.engadget.com/2012/04/02/oracle-and-google-get-a-trial-date-april-16th-is-the-start-of-a/
[4]: http://www.engadget.com
[5]: http://www.weblogsinc.com/feed-terms/
[6]: http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/ (Permanent link to this entry)
[7]: http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_VIA.gif
[8]: http://www.theverge.com/2012/5/23/3023627/oracle-google-trial-patent-verdict
[9]: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13578_3-57440119-38/jury-says-google-did-not-infringe-on-oracle-patents/?tag=cnetRiver
[10]: http://www.blogsmithmedia.com/www.engadget.com/media/post_label_source.gif
[11]: http://www.scribd.com/doc/94578158/12-05-23-Oracle-Google-Patent-Verdict
[12]: http://www.engadget.com/forward/20243704/ (Send this entry to a friend via email)
[13]: http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/#comments (View reader comments on this entry)
URL: http://www.engadget.com/2012/05/23/jury-google-oracle/
No comments:
Post a Comment